- EVs are much less more likely to rear-end different vehicles because of improved frontal collision avoidance tech
- They’re, nevertheless, extra more likely to be rear-ended
- EVs nonetheless take extra time and are costlier to restore versus gas-powered vehicles
It seems that driving an EV might make you much less of a street hazard—no less than from behind. A new examine exhibits that EVs are racking up fewer and fewer front-end collisions in comparison with their gas-powered counterparts. The info exhibits that ICE vehicles are, on common, 6% extra more likely to be concerned in a repairable front-end collision than EVs (32% vs 26%, respectively). So what is the secret, precisely? Effectively, it is all that fancy new driver-assistance tech!
Let’s dive into why EVs are profitable this battle. The main motive is simply how new EVs are to market; fresh-off-the-line EVs on the street have a more moderen common mannequin 12 months in comparison with most gas-powered fashions. This implies newer and extra refreshed tech planted in EVs—lane-keeping, front-crash avoidance methods, and automated emergency braking—are all doing their job fairly properly and padding the stats within the EVs’ favor.
Photograph by: Tesla
Apparently, whereas repairable EVs are much less more likely to hit a car from the entrance, they’re extra more likely to be plowed into from the rear. The examine exhibits that 36% of BEV repairs are for rear-end impacts versus 28% of ICE autos. This feels like such a bizarre statistic, does not it? However stick with me right here, as a result of there could be a simple clarification as to why.
The examine hypothesizes that regenerative braking could possibly be accountable. Particularly, it calls out the distinction in driving dynamics when driving an EV in single-pedal mode versus utilizing friction braking to decelerate an ICE-powered automotive. Regardless of EVs gaining popularity, they nonetheless solely make up round 8% of recent car gross sales, so drivers—you recognize, those tailgating you whereas weaving out and in of site visitors—won’t be prepared for an EV’s regenerative braking to do its factor when the motive force lifts off the gasoline pedal abruptly.
Let’s discuss turkey whereas we’re right here. Entrance-end collisions are considerably costlier to repair than being hit within the rear. The examine estimates that restore prices are, on common, round 40% increased for front-end crashes, making EVs an surprising ally on this division. The flip facet is that they are nonetheless costlier within the store and take longer to restore.
This could possibly be because of the overwhelmingly excessive use of OEM components to finish restores. The examine goes on to level out that 90.3% of components utilized in BEV repairs are OEM components straight from the producer. ICE autos use round 64.4%, which helps to chop down on prices. And to rub salt within the wound, fewer components will be repaired as a substitute of changed in EVs (12.4% vs 13.9%, respectively).
These stats do not imply that EVs are getting totaled at the next fee than ICE. Actually, the overall loss frequency is sort of the identical, differing by lower than one-tenth of a %. Nonetheless, the typical complete lack of an EV is increased at $32,718 for BEVs in Q3 versus $31,070 for mannequin 12 months 2021 and newer ICE vehicles.
It is solely a matter of time earlier than refreshed gasoline vehicles get outfitted with related tech that helps keep away from these embarrassing “whoops” moments behind the wheel. For now, you’ll be able to no less than really feel a bit bit safer pulling as much as a crimson mild when an EV is behind you—simply hope that the EV driver does not have a rushing ICE automotive arising behind it.
